<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seth Godin, charts, and clear communication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lancebledsoe.com/seth-godin-charts-and-clear-communication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lancebledsoe.com/seth-godin-charts-and-clear-communication/</link>
	<description>Data junkie. Math geek. Rock star.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:05:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance Bledsoe</title>
		<link>http://www.lancebledsoe.com/seth-godin-charts-and-clear-communication/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance Bledsoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bledsoetech.com/2008/07/seth-godin-charts-and-clear-communication/#comment-367</guid>
		<description>I can certainly see how someone presenting for a non-technical audience would want to keep potentially confusing &quot;nuances&quot; to a minimum. And if someone is zipping thru a presentation at a 30-second-per-slide pace, that would also argue for simplicity.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But it seems to me that Godin&#039;s three laws wouldn&#039;t help to simplify this sort of presentation, and in fact might make things worse. Part of being clear is selecting the appropriate chart or graph for the point you&#039;re making, and often a bar chart is exactly the right choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can certainly see how someone presenting for a non-technical audience would want to keep potentially confusing "nuances" to a minimum. And if someone is zipping thru a presentation at a 30-second-per-slide pace, that would also argue for simplicity.</p>
<p>But it seems to me that Godin's three laws wouldn't help to simplify this sort of presentation, and in fact might make things worse. Part of being clear is selecting the appropriate chart or graph for the point you're making, and often a bar chart is exactly the right choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Peltier</title>
		<link>http://www.lancebledsoe.com/seth-godin-charts-and-clear-communication/comment-page-1/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Peltier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bledsoetech.com/2008/07/seth-godin-charts-and-clear-communication/#comment-366</guid>
		<description>Not only is Seth talking about PowerPoint charts shown to a nontechnical audience, his talks typically fly through slides, so his chart will be visible for maybe 30 seconds. This enforces his &#039;one message per chart&#039; rule, and probably negates the difference between a pie chart and a bar chart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only is Seth talking about PowerPoint charts shown to a nontechnical audience, his talks typically fly through slides, so his chart will be visible for maybe 30 seconds. This enforces his 'one message per chart' rule, and probably negates the difference between a pie chart and a bar chart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

